Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XIII: Lost Identity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to XIII (video game). There is clear consensus that there should not be a standalone article here. The 'merge but nothing to merge' arguments, plus the mention already there in the main XIII article make a redirect appropriate. Michig (talk) 17:51, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

XIII: Lost Identity

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable to hold its own article. I did a search and only found this from Destructoid. Neither Gamespot nor IGN (the ones who review the most games, IMO) have reviews or major mentions of the game. — Ṟ  Ṉ™  17:33, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.   czar   &middot;   &middot;  17:56, 21 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. All WP:VG/RS are very sparse on content: doesn't meet GNG. Consider merging into an existing article on the series' video game adaptations and building out there. (I'd vote "merge" now, but there isn't anything there to merge.)  czar  &middot;   &middot;  18:07, 21 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Merging probably is the best thing to do. By the way IGN have a page on the game here. 1916Walker987 (talk) 18:13, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * That is a general page IGN makes with every game. The point is that IGN has no review, no articles about it. — Ṟ  Ṉ™  18:48, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The redirect could work though since the article for the comic does mention this game. I do agree that there is nothing to merge.--174.93.171.10 (talk) 02:49, 22 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per proposal; no reliable sources. Cyan Gardevoir  (used EDIT!) 06:10, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete there is already a small section in XIII (video game). Also fails notability. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 13:03, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.