Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XLERATOR


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:12, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

XLERATOR

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

notability and COI concerns. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 15:19, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Promotional article. The references are all either spurious (e.g. #1 is about a rival product) or based on PR material, or do not qualify as reliable sources per WP policy. Fails WP:SPAM, WP:RS andy (talk) 14:41, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

This article cites the websites of BBC, Western New York College, Slate, ABC, Discovery Channel, Crain's Chicago Business, Environmental Design and Construction, and other reliable sources. I honestly do not understand why it continues to be marked for deletion. This object is more notable than the Dyson Airblade, which does not seem to have the same problem. Helvetica13 (talk) 02:34, 25 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:54, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Because it's a spam article, without reliable sources, no proof of notability and probably created by someone with a serious conflict of interest. That's enough! andy (talk) 08:12, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.