Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XLeague.tv


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep (although apparently "feeble") - trim it please. -- Anonymous Dissident  Talk 09:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

XLeague.tv

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Gaming channel and website, with no real assertion of notability. The few sources that are used are mostly trivial, and are mainly press releases stating things like the launch of the channel. None are placed in text, so it's not directly obvious what each source is supposed to be supporting. Almost all of the author's edits are to this article, or placing links to the site on other articles. Drat (Talk) 02:24, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 
 * VERY weak Keep While it could use being trimmed down considerably and stripped of PR fluff, I think it's probably notable. First page of G-hits turned up several news stories and bits on well-established gamer sites. Possible WP:COI violation given the pattern of editing by the original editor but it could stand on its own. Pigman 04:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 17:07, 14 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep: Per above comment. I agree that it needs some de-fluffing however this is notable (a few more independent sources wouldn't hurt). - Rjd0060 17:25, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Feable Keep - needs a trim as stated above. -MarsRover 06:28, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.