Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XLnotes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 23:18, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

XLnotes

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Notability of the software is not demonstrated in the article. I failed to find any sources to validate the inclusion of this article. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:08, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:08, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:08, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Comment I have WP:AGF with this editor for now. Despite you not having found sources for his software, I would suggest we allow User:Qery2 to submit some of his references before deletion takes place. -- WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  19:18, 27 July 2012 (UTC) I'm the owner of the software, but I've tried to write the article without vague and promotional sentences. The article makes sence in context of lists of notetaking software and ouliners, since it presents a rather notable and rare example of a free form outliner (compared to tree-structured outliners) Should I state it explicitly in the article?. Qery2 (talk) 18:45, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure, Qery2 has at least 7 days. The problem is not with good/bad faith, but with the lack of notability. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:24, 27 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - I can find no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 13:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:09, 3 August 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete I found no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. --Kvng (talk) 12:51, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, the article has not been edited for too long. Userfy if it has not already been done so. When the creator gets his software reviewed and it becomes notable enough, it can be recreated. -- WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  14:25, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.