Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XMail


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Listed for 14 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough participation to determine consensus. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:07, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

XMail

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

non notable mail server. No references. disputed prod. noq (talk) 12:52, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:32, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep: I was doing to vote delete based on the state of the article but then I found this which might be enough to save it and also provide some material to expand the article a bit. It seems that there are also some other software products and hosted services called XMail and these get most of the hits when you search, so we need to be careful to exclude those. Possibly some of these others are notable too. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:45, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment "XMail" is an X/11 mail client using BSD mail handling facilities - and any oldtime user of Unix as a desktop OS would be more familiar with the client than the new XMail server this article is talking about. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 04:02, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Indeed, the old Unix xmail is probably the more notable of the two. There is/was also a hosted service from O2 called XMail and there may also be other things called XMail too. This doesn't preclude this one being notable although it does make it harder to check. The book reference I link above definitely is about this particular XMail. --DanielRigal (talk) 10:08, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 13:57, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.