Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XOFTspy Portable Anti-Spyware


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. --Stefan talk 15:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

XOFTspy Portable Anti-Spyware

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable software; written like an advertisement Bahustard 19:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. B figura  (talk) 19:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This one is actually notable as being the first of something, it is also independently sourced and reliably so --  Chil dzy  ¤  Ta lk  22:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - several decent sources already in the article. — xDanielx T/C 10:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - As stated in another discussion... this "new" user with no past edit history has come out of the woodwork to plaster Wikipedia with deletion requests for all the products of a single company. This should raise a few red flags as to the motive of the AfD.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.5.119.134 (talk) 15:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Meanwhile, the chief defense has come from an anon IP who does nothing but work on Paretologic articles. So I think it cancels out.  Bahustard 19:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep (although without much enthusiasm). It's clear that the article was started to plug the product, but the product is just notable enough to merit a short article. I deleted a section of links to product reviews. -- Rob C. alias Alarob 03:54, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions.   — Rob C. alias Alarob 04:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.