Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XO (record label)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kagundu  Talk To Me  10:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

XO (record label)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It lacks WP:GNG, WP:MUSICBIO and WP:NOTABILITY. BJPlaya10 (talk) 18:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. Very notable record label. Unnecessary AfD nomination. M assiveYR   ♠  19:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - certainly has had massive success with The Weekend, and significant success with Nav (rapper), and Belly (rapper) is notable. I would agree with "speedy keep" but it is sure hard to find independent sources giving in-depth information about this label, which is odd for a label that has had this amount of chart success.  This success (and the label's history in general) has been as a subsidiary of Republic Records, so a "merge" to that label is not out of the question.  However, "delete" would the wrong outcome, as the information is useful to discographers, musicologists, and music historians.    78.26   (spin me / revolutions) 14:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep a major label, the label has references to reliable sources for a close pass of WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 16:06, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per 78.26. Also, this article discusses XO as a label and brand, a la OVO Sound.  gongshow  talk  10:16, 14 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.