Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XSplash


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bootsplash.  bibliomaniac 1  5  03:12, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

XSplash

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Un-notable software program, only one source. This source also fails WP:GNG. dibbydib Ping me! 💬/✏ 22:29, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. dibbydib Ping me! 💬/✏ 22:29, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. dibbydib Ping me! 💬/✏ 22:29, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. dibbydib Ping me! 💬/✏ 22:29, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. dibbydib Ping me! 💬/✏ 22:29, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I agree, XSplash shouldn't have it's own article. It could be merged into a new article about previous Ubuntu splash screen software together with Usplash though. - Flori4nK  T A L K

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 23:44, 31 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete, not notable, even Usplash should be deleted, let alone this, but Plymouth is notable and in widely use since years ago.--Editor-1 (talk) 09:10, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Bootsplash, where it is mentioned. The same could be done for Usplash and Plymouth until they are better developed. I was unable to find sources to satisfy WP:GNG, but these programs have basic facts that are verifiable and XSplash is a plausible search term. -- 09:24, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Bootsplash. The sole source is a blog, so it does not justify a standalone article. Cheers, 1292simon (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.