Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XULRunner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 10:35, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

XULRunner

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT, all sources are from bug trackers, mailing lists, and similar. Anton.bersh (talk) 07:23, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 07:23, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 07:23, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 07:23, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 07:23, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Anton.bersh (talk) 07:23, 5 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep, meets WP:GNG per the available reliable, independent, secondary sources.

SailingInABathTub (talk) 08:48, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The first source does seem relevant, but I'm not sure about the other two. Mastering XPages covers XULRunner only in passing, among many other things. The third one appears to be connected to XUL development.
 * I see a lot of papers on Google Scholar, but cound not find one discussing XULRunner in detais and clearly not connected to it.
 * Anton.bersh (talk) 09:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * There are plenty more sources ...


 * SailingInABathTub (talk) 09:30, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Anyone else? SailingInABathTub !voted twice.
 * Keep: Article is good enough to pass WP:NSOFT with reliable sources indicated by SailingInABathTub. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:47, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per the sources that BathTub presented, but note that the second source is flagged as unreliable by Cite Unseen. CanadianOtaku  Talk Page 21:53, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment:, correction. As the 2nd participant who voted "keep" prior to the relisting, did not vote twice.  ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 01:21, 16 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.