Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XXXO


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:53, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

XXXO

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not notable as it does not have a firm release date, supporting album, is a stub, has not charted, nor recieved extensive awards or independent coverage. Lil-unique1 (talk) 01:21, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Edited since AfD'd. - BalthCat (talk) 05:49, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Contrary to what the nominator said, being a stub is not a reason for deletion. It's a reason for expansion. D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 16:00, 14 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:57, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to M.I.A. (artist) as it has not yet charted. However, unlike the nomination comment states, this actually was released to iTunes today. – Chase  ( talk ) 23:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's the first single from the album, it has a cover, it has been released...what more could you want? Just because a song has not yet charted is no reason for it to be deleted or redirected. Of course if it has just been released it has not charted, do you want a debut at #1 on the first day it's released? More so, how can you expect for a song just released to be given awards? A simple Google News search shows 43 results, which I would call extensive independent coverage. Even if this is somehow redirected, it would just be created again in a couple of days. I see no reason for action to take place.  Corn.u. co.pia  •  Disc.u s.sion   12:41, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - has been released, contrary to what the nom states, will almost certainly chart, and already has a ton of independent reliable coverage -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:56, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Has been released, and has enough RS coverage to warrant a stand-alone article.  (talk) 19:25, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.