Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X and king


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 06:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

X and king

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Personal essay; not suitable or notable for inclusion in Wikipedia Mhking 17:55, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NOT point 3. -- Pious7 18:01, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and salt. This is twice deleted content, twice reposted by the same user who has been warned.-- Dakota 19:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete/Speedy delete - Dakota has said it all. HagenUK 20:49, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as said by Dakota. PeteShanosky 22:55, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and salt, and block user if he tries to repost. JuJube 01:22, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, delete as essay, but it warranted looking at-- and being an unreferenced essay or OR are not valid reasons for speedy. Neither is re-creation after a speedy or a prod. just an unsophisticated essay. I think blocking or threatened blocking or salting an over-reaction to the nuisance of this one article. DGG 07:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and second DGG's comments. G4 is incorrectly applied here, and the editor who is reposting may not understand what's going on. --Mus Musculus 16:38, 14 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.