Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X to Y


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

X to Y

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable short film. Truthbanks12345 (talk) 18:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  18:56, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Delete without prejudice and Userfy to author at User:Tizzler27/sandbox/X to Y. I made the article much prettier per MOS, but it only barely has just doesn't have enough yet to meet wiki standards for film articles. I believe it will win more awards and get proper reviews which can be added for an eventual return to main space. But right now... even prettier... it is just not enough.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:51, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The film won an award at a notable film festival which can be verified by the sources. Not an award at the level of Academy Awards, but still enough to establish notability based on the guidelines. - Mgm|(talk) 11:21, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep since MGM is right. Again, nice job, MQS! Drmies (talk) 05:31, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  | Talk 00:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - per Mgm. Rlendog (talk) 18:41, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Mgm. Edward321 (talk) 02:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.