Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xacti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:29, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Xacti

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article is little more than a list of models, has no references, and does nothing to establish that the range is notable ColinFine (talk) 22:16, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - It appears to be a major product line from Sanyo with the Xacti brand being the pistol shaped camcorder. Not surprisingly Xacti models are reviewed in technology magazines such as PC World, and PC Magazine.  These are only two out of a huge list of reviews of Xacti products from technology press.  Beyond that, mainstream sources such as the Edmonton Journal and the New York Times, and again. -- Whpq (talk) 20:39, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge to Sanyo article as a subsection for exactly the reasons mentioned by User:Whpq previously. -- Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 08:24, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep The topic is evidently notable and just needs improvement per our editing policy. Colonel Warden (talk) 06:53, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - for the reason above, that Xacti is a major product line from Sanyo. I agree that the article needs work.  Istara (talk) 09:57, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.