Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xanadu Range


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 05:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Xanadu Range

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This appears to be a hoax, I was not able to find any sources that support the existence of this mountain range. -- JamesMoose (talk) 21:47, 12 February 2014 (UTC)


 * delete as patent hoax; I too could find no mention of this range. Mangoe (talk) 22:54, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 14 February 2014 (UTC)


 * this page is to support the further discovery of the Purcell Mountains of South-Eastern British Columbia. This is a new classification for the area to distinguish the mountains around Kimberley. Note that no sources have been found by the Wiki staff, because it is a newly designated area. Please DO NOT delete this page for the reason of the further exploration and recreational promotion of this area. Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.66.12.225 (talk)


 * Designated by whom? Wikipedia is not for things you made up one day. Mangoe (talk) 13:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Place names in BC are designated by the BC Geographical Names commission. They have no entry for Xanadu:  The Interior  (Talk) 17:26, 18 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails verifiability in spectacular fashion. An assertion was made in the article after it was nominated for deletion  indicating that the article is for "promotion of outdoor activity around the Kimberley area".  -- Whpq (talk) 17:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Designation appears in no online or print sources on BC geographical features. If there is a push to rename part of the southern Selkirks Purcells, I've heard nothing about it.  Extremely premature, if it is legit.  The Interior  (Talk) 17:33, 18 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.