Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xanth timeline


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete as copyvio and not an article anyway. Kusma (討論) 09:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Xanth timeline

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No notability claimed. This falls under indescriminate collection of information by even the most conservative interpretation. Oh, did I mention it's a copyvio? http://www.piers-anthony.com/xanthtimeline.html --Infrangible 03:04, 1 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete no notablity and incoherent. Wooyi 03:09, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Josh Parris 04:35, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * G12 Speedy Delete Was going to go keep, until I saw the copyvio part. I put a link to the external site in the Xanth article. Away with this. Citicat 05:28, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Copyvio and looks awful. Winterborn 07:19, 1 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Axl 07:57, 1 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.