Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xaraya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. The article still contains no independent, reliable sources. Sandstein 16:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Xaraya

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

expired uncontested prod, but this article has been around awhile with many editors so it should be afd'ed not prod'ed. Prod tag was WP:N and WP:V and WP:SPAM, which about sums up what the article is. Carlossuarez46 00:05, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - One of the better known CMS / CMF and notable enough, even if the article are in need of drastic improving. -- KTC 03:48, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Or drastically improve it, if what KTC says is correct, I hope someone who knows about it can rewrite almost all the article. Jackaranga 14:23, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions.  -- KTC 03:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Reliable sources:   JulesH 16:45, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Those are probably not the best links one could have provided. I've never heard of the first one and have no access to the article so can't necessarily comment on it. The second one is an article on XOOPS where the only mention of Xaraya is "Meanwhile, some of the central PostNuke developers have left that project, forking it into software that originally was known as LostNuke and now goes by the name of Xaraya.". KTC 18:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 00:33, 10 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as there are so, so many PHP CMS packages (and even so many PHP-Nuke derivants) that reliable sources for importance are really necessary. --Dhartung | Talk 05:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of reliable sources. Those provided by JulesH are not helpful, either. Xoloz 15:07, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.