Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xat.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 21:58, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Xat.com

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable website with no coverage in reliable third-party sources. Q T C 01:45, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, was about to second the prod when it was removed.  fetch  comms  ☛ 01:46, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --CapitalR (talk) 02:09, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:01, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. (GregJackP (talk) 14:59, 20 April 2010 (UTC))


 * Non notable website with over 10million users now?... hows that work... type chatroom onto google, xat is second result (: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.107.72 (talk • contribs) 20:37, 21 April 2010
 * Non-notable in Wikipedia-sense means it does not meet Wikipedia's guidelines of notability, regardless of how many registered users it has. --Andromedabluesphere440 (talk) 11:31, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Then surely this article should be marked a stub and not deleted?...


 * Don't Delete I don't think this article should be deleted, just work on and expand the article, I added an entire section just now, though someone needs to source the xat wiki for me, I don't know how to do that. This website is to important just to delete. 74.176.37.155 (talk) 01:59, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.