Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xavior Abasi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:17, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Xavior Abasi

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Novel is self-published Lulu book. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC.  ttonyb (talk) 15:04, 11 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Obvious non-notable. None of their records have an article associated with them. No references at all, which don't back up any points. Possibly fits the CSD A7. Minima  c  ([[User talk:Minimac| talk

]]) 15:08, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep there are plenty of hits on google about xavior I have list just one from billboard that list his song "takin me higher" at #1 on the dance charts. Again, I do not understand why you desire to delete him, but there is reason for him to exist on wikipedia, his fans would appreciate it and he has many.  reference http://www.billboard.com/news/dance-trax-735673.story#/news/dance-trax-735673.story Dirtthole (talk) 15:30, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment – I cannot find anything of substance about him. There are a couple of issues: first, per Wikipedia guidelines only individuals that meet the Wikipedia criteria for notability should have articles.  That notability is defined in WP:BIO, WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC and must use reliable sources.  Notability for this article has not been established using reliable sources.  Second, this is not a fan site, if you wish to get his accomplishments out to his fans, a personally website is probably a better choice until he meets the notability criteria.  Third, the reference you provided is not "non-trivial" coverage of the individual.  It is only a very, very, very, brief mention of his name.   ttonyb  (talk) 15:47, 11 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Response how sad is it that because perhaps you have not heard of him or are not a "fan" and have the ability to delete you would make it your plight to remove the option of having a small piece of internet space. This is not a fight that i am willing to fight - if it will make you feel complete by exercising your power of deletion to rid this HUGE database of names of one person who we feel in the house community has made an impact, then be honored. There are many more battles worth fighting and this is not one of them 174.1.52.192 (talk) 18:19, 11 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment – I suggest you re-read my message above. The deletion has nothing to do with me not knowing anything about him, but rather that nothing has been presented to validate the items in the article.  Wikipedia is about presenting  verifiable articles, not about allowing a someone to have a fan site.  As I indicated  above, there are better places to accomplish this.  (i.e., a personal webpage).  Unfortunately, the author of the article has the burden of providing adequate reliable sources that meet Wikipedia criteria.  I am sorry to say that if you do not wish to participate in bringing the article up to standards, the article will most likely be deleted; however, if you have any specific questions as to what is needed for the article to meet Wikipedia criteria, please let me know on my talk page.  My best to you...  ttonyb  (talk) 18:47, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. When you have a statement like "Internationally known for his contributions in the dance music" without a citation, this is a red flag. Hard to find independent, reliable sources here. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 13:54, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.