Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XavlegbmaofffassssitimiwoamndutroabcwapwaeiippohfffX


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 19:35, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

XavlegbmaofffassssitimiwoamndutroabcwapwaeiippohfffX

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NBAND and WP:TOOSOON. Absolutely nothing on this page is a reliable source except for some minor coverage by MetalSucks, and even then the coverage isn't even for the band's music. Just a crap band that got some minor Internet attention for having a really stupid band name Second Skin (talk) 19:34, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:44, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:44, 28 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete This articles seems to only attract attention for its name. There are instances like this in the sciences, like Brainfuck programming language. However, unlike that esoteric language, this article does not have reliable independent coverage. Sociable Song (talk) 01:51, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:BAND and WP:1E: its name. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:33, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - In agreement with the comments above; namely they can't get past WP:1E since their music has not been noticed in the media and they have only gotten a few minor mentions of their ridiculous name. I will give each of the guys in this band a nickel if they can recite the band's name purely from memory. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 17:49, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - Citations to coverage by Metal Injection and Metal Hammer have been added to the article since the creation of this deletion proposal. Between those and the MetalSucks citation, that adds up to at least three independent, reliable sources, and therefore the article no longer fails WP:NBAND. Though the ridiculous nature of the band's nature is mentioned in most coverage, articles about the band also range in topic from the release of their album Gore 2.0 to the release of a music video for one of their songs, and so the article therefore does not fail WP:1E. – Matthew  - (talk) 23:12, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Additional comment: Second Skin's statement that coverage of the band by MetalSucks "isn't even for the band's music" is just blatantly not true. As you can see in this article (which is one of at least two times the website has covered this band), it's primarily about the release of one of the band's albums, with discussion of specific tracks from said album. – Matthew  - (talk) 23:20, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 *  Comment: a plethora of sources (and this is not even a plethora) does not always add up to notability for Wikipedia articles. This article still does not meet WP:BAND. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:03, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Ok there's like 2 sentences about the music. Haha big deal? That page basically says "LOOK AT THIS RIDICULOUS BAND NAME, oh and the music is pretty good too... BUT LOOK AT THE NAME AND TITLES LOL." It's painfully obvious that the entire web and converge was only written cuz of the band name alone and anyone can see that. Also even if two other source publications wrote about this band to talk about their dumb name cuz they had nothing better to cover that weekend still doesn't make the band pass WP:1E. Second Skin (talk) 19:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Despite Matthews comments, the article does not meet WP:BAND. On a lighter tone, who thought this would be a good name for a band? AmericanAir88(talk) 16:24, 3 August 2019 (UTC)Lightburst (talk) 19:46, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * COMMENT I know I’m not supposed to edit when the discussion is closed but just to answer your question it’s kind of a ongoing thing to have ridiculous long names in the goregrind genre, take a look here for the ultimate example. This band on the other hand takes that trait and uses it as a horrid gimmick for attention purposes and publicity to cash in on their otherwise bland music Second Skin (talk) 07:26, 12 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete: Outrageous, offensive and perverse name. Subject fails WP:BAND, fails WP:GNG and WP:1E is applicable. Lightburst (talk) 19:46, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete After reviewing the sources in the article and attempting to find more, I am completely unconvinced that this is anywhere near enough to meet GNG/#1 of WP:BAND. This band also appears to fail all other criteria of BAND. Zingarese talk  ·  contribs  14:02, 4 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.