Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xbox TEN


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Neutralitytalk 02:14, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Xbox TEN

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article doesn't seem to fit any speedy delete categories, and the author removed the WP:PROD template after changing a single word. Article is pure crystal ball and the name "Xbox TEN" seems to stem purely from speculation made by a podcaster. ferret (talk) 12:55, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - pure speculation based on unreliable sources. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:00, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - the name of the page is even made up 'Xbox ten', until an official announcement is made or more verifiable information exists, this page should be deleted.  Jab843 (talk) 17:27, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete – Only one of the sources mentions the project by name, but all of them involve rumors by Microsoft and speculations thereof. –MuZemike 20:38, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  –MuZemike 20:38, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Speculation from unreliable sources. While the Joystiq is usuable as a source in general, it's not good in this instance, as it doesn't even refer to the articles name. Far too little is known about this future system for it to warrant an article. Sergecross73   msg me   21:25, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I this a real Xbox? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.62.59 (talk) 00:11, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Currently it's nothing more than a rumour. Reach Out to the Truth 02:48, 12 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - As per everyone else -- speculation, rumour, etc. Salvidrim (talk) 19:37, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Consists entirely of speculation and rumors, failing the general notability guideline. Chris (talk) 22:55, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:TOOSOON. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:09, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment shouldn't there be a successor section in the 360 article? If so, this could redirect there (as a putative name in the wild) 70.24.248.23 (talk) 10:52, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Is there anything confirmed yet though, beyond the fact that they're likely working on it? Sergecross73   msg me   15:33, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.