Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xconfig


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  06:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Xconfig

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails RS, N (NSOFT), V. Not a notable element of the Linux kernel. It has existed since 2005, and has had a sourcing issue since 2009. No reliable significant sources have been found in 18 years, and I doubt any will turn up soon. Some sources do exist that mention xconfig, but it is a passing mention that confirm it exists (EXIST), and it is certainly not the focus of them. WhoAteMyButter ( 🌴talk │ ☀️contribs ) 04:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software.  WhoAteMyButter  ( 🌴talk │ ☀️contribs ) 04:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. If we're gonna have an article for every config and makefile in the Linux kernel, we'll be here for a long time. Considering that even .bashrc, init.el, and .vimrc don't have their own own articles despite being some of the most edited config files in Linux is telling. 〜 Festucalex  •  talk  05:07, 29 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.