Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xen'drik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to World of Eberron. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:11, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Xen'drik

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This does not establish notability independent of Eberron through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 22:33, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge into World of Eberron. BOZ (talk) 23:51, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * transwiki to some fansite that would love this trivia. as for Wikipedia, subject fails WP:GNG in having no significant coverage by independent reliable sources. which leaves the options of merge redirect or delete. Since the proposed merge target is suffering from the same issues as this article, being bloated with primary sourced inuniverse content, merging would seem to be an exercise in shoveling the shit from one corner of the stall to another. i have seen no evidence that the word is a likely search term to leave as a redirect, and the history of the redirects in this subject area being restored without meeting WP:GNG would mean that it would need to be locked. Deletion seems to be the viable option.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  12:39, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 1 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge and Redirect  into World of Eberron. The info is verifiable in authoritative sources and the topic is a reasonable search term. Per WP:PRESERVE, merging of verifiable topics is preferable to deletion and WP:ATD-M seems to apply here, Pages about non-notable fictional elements are generally merged into list articles or articles covering the work of fiction in which they appear. --Mark viking (talk) 06:01, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.