Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xen: Ancient English Edition


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Snowolf How can I help? 03:30, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Xen: Ancient English Edition

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article has been prodded so many times it's having trouble standing up. It's been deprodded in both good and bad faith, but none have really contested the deletion. Regardless, it's just easier to sort this out here. Procedural nom, no opinion (yet) UsaSatsui (talk) 07:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Google searches didn't turn up anything useful, other than the book being on google.books, but I'm not sure that warrants inclusion. Otherwise, the book fails Notability (books) and reads like an advertisement. It has no sources and it doesn't seem like a note-worthy masterpiece. So delete from me. Spawn Man Review Me! 08:52, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete While not technically "self-published", the publisher is so small and obscure (2 authors, according to its website) that it might as well be. Fails WP:N and WP:BK. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Reads like an advertisement. Dchall1 (talk) 02:37, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.