Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xena: Warrior Princess, Hercules: The Legendary Journeys and Young Hercules Awards and Nominations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Keilana | Parlez ici 23:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Xena: Warrior Princess, Hercules: The Legendary Journeys and Young Hercules Awards and Nominations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Inappropriate attempt to split out the award sections from Xena and adding in two additional television series into a single, messy awards. No consensus for such a split from Xena, and no attempt was ever made to add the awards to the others. The awards won by the shows are not notable on their own and should be covered in the respective main articles for each show. None of those show articles have legitimate size issues to justify a split. Collectonian (talk) 23:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   —Collectonian (talk) 00:03, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Unless it is an FL, I do not believe in awards articles. Also, combining two shows' awards is controversial.  – thedemonhog   talk  •  edits  00:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into the individual shows' articles. If you think a merge is more appropriate, why list it at AfD? --Canley (talk) 00:40, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * One doesn't need a merge, the awards were already in the Xena article. Hercules and Young Hercules don't appear to have had such sections, but I don't work in those two often, so may just be another copy paste. Collectonian (talk) 00:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. The awards for each respective show should be in the show's own article. Combining all three shows' awards into one article appears to be misguided. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 09:41, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - the award information belongs with each individual show and not as a conglomeration -- Whpq (talk) 13:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into their respective articles. If an article can be merged, it should not be nominated for deletion. --Pixelface (talk) 14:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Both series had great participation in the awards, and had notable awards, as Emmys -- Tarja Lawless (talk) 14:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Either Merge into relevant articles or at least delete nominations, these are not notable, only awards won are notable.--NeilEvans (talk) 23:32, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as awards and nominations are consistent with the Five pillars, i.e. that Wikipedia contains elements of almanacs. My almanacs list awards and nominations.  Best, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 18:39, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:N - really, this sort of thing tarnishes the encyclopedia's reputation for scholarliness, such as it is. Biruitorul (talk) 20:26, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.