Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xeniya Lamber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Top Model of The World 2010. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:24, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Xeniya Lamber

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Biography of a Ukrainian fashion model that shows no indications of notability. A top three finish in Top Model of The World 2010 and a gig modeling for a fashion house. No significant coverage to be found anywhere. The Top Model thing might be notable, in which case a redirect might be in order, but the article author has already undone that change. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:44, 27 August 2013 (UTC) The following comment from was added to Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Xeniya Lamber. It is transcluded here to be part of the overall dialog. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:05, 27 August 2013 (UTC) She is also actress with imdb record. Referenced movie is famous enough to have it's own article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return_to_House_on_Haunted_Hill I believe that her page is covered by wikipedia criterias described on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28people%29 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osykov (talk • contribs)
 * Not everybody acting in a notable film is notable: many films have large numbers of insignificant, minor roles in them. As for having a record at IMDb, virtually anyone who has ever taken any part whatever in any commercial film qualifies, even a very minor role in a totally obscure and non-notable film. IMDb is no evidence of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:16, 28 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment An actress with a single minor role in one movie. That hardly meets the criteria.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:05, 27 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment But isnt overall notability covered by these criterias and she deserves just a bit more than just a redirect to Top World Model page?
 * Comment Overall notability, as defined in WP:BIO and WP:GNG is defined by significant coverage in reliable sources, so that these sources can be used to verify the article content. Due to the lack of significant coverage, we can't build a sufficient article about this model.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:18, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 28 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to competition. Redirects are cheap and useful. Also preserves the history should future events warrant expansion of an independent article with legit sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 03:44, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence anywhere of notability. By all means we can create a redirect, but there is nothing substantial in the article's history worth keeping. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:11, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. Any Ukrainian girl is a model, and we have millions of them over here) Ukrained2012 (talk) 10:18, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above to the model contest. As Candleabracadabra says, redirects are cheap and useful and should she go anywhere down the notability route, at least the history is there to work with. Mabalu (talk) 13:13, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.