Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xenomania production discography


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:16, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Xenomania production discography

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Spam The Banner  talk 17:44, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:58, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:35, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:35, 18 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment – This comes across as potentially meeting WP:SPLIT, as a functional subpage of the main Xenomania page, which is a bit lengthy. Many discography pages exist on Wikipedia, as demonstrated at Category:Discographies by artist nationality. Starting from this category, after surfing in the subcategories, I found the Featured list class article Chrisye discography, which is impressive. Ultimately, such articles should maybe not be deleted per a four-letter rationale at AfD stating the word "spam", and nothing else. More qualification regarding why this particular discography article should be deleted would be beneficial here. North America1000 20:41, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * This is not a discography of a band but from a production company. The Banner  talk 23:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - The nominator does not justify good enough reasons for deletion. Exactly what is spammy about this page? Anything unsourced and/or inaccurate can just be removed. Ignoring that, this is a notable production team, which well pass GNG guidelines and has a long-line of work and credits to justify its existence. If this was merged into the team's page, it would likely make the page way too long. Sorry. Foxnpichu (talk) 10:55, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep A valid split off article from the main one. The main article is notable, listing what they have done to make them so is standard, and if it won't all fit there, put it in a side article.   D r e a m Focus  11:28, 19 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep nomination is not detailed enough.  killer bee    13:42, 19 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Request speedy close as keep Okay, I got the message. Spamming is allowed. So soon we can get discographies from nearly everybody in the music industry. WEA, Ariola, Warner, down to the studio owners, the 3th assistant sound engineer and the coffee and the cleaning lady. Not my problem anymore.  The Banner  talk 19:55, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * - That is not what we are saying. Since you did not specify what in the article was spam, we have to guess ourselves. After looking in the article, I did not see anything that could be considered spam. Foxnpichu (talk) 22:13, 19 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.