Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xerafy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Shi meru  07:20, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Xerafy

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No evidence of notability Schuhpuppe (talk) 22:15, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, weakly, per nomination. This business is a vendor of passive UHF EPC Radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags for mounting on metal assets... used to help locate and identify items for inventory management, scheduled maintenance, and quality control.  Their chief claim to fame would be the claim that their RFID tags work on metals, because ordinarily radio waves and metals do not mix.  This would be interesting, if it worked.  But I find nothing that looks like an independent reliable source for this.  - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:44, 21 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. Google news turns up this article but it's in Chinese so it's very difficult for me to determine if the article is a press release, and if the site itself might be considered a reliable source. -- Whpq (talk) 16:56, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * That article looks like simple coverage of an appearance at a trade exhibition; but the Babelfish machine translation is enough to move me to interpretive dance. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:33, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Do not delete -I've added additional references to support the article and valid sources verifying the claims. There are more press releases coming with customer applications. Kellystark (talk) 23:27, 24 June 2010 (UTC)KellyStark


 * Delete This will need coverage in third-party reliable sources to show notability. It doesn't have that yet. First Light (talk) 02:43, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.