Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xerxes (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was     redirect to 300 (film). Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Xerxes (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Per WP:NFF; Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles. Xerxes specifically is in the very earliest stages of development as the source material has yet to even be published. There is no sure production much less for film this in this stage of the process. TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:45, 13 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to 300 (film) like before. This project has been discussed for a while, but it is nowhere near production. For all we know, Snyder will spend two years doing the new Superman movie. No issue with article recreation if filming ever does begin. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 21:55, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: Redirection is an acceptable solution. If that is what is decided this AfD could be used to point to for consensus in case of reversion.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 22:03, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Reliable link here: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1253863/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexrose08 (talk • contribs) 00:03, 19 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment. This debate was not listed in the log, so I'm going to go ahead and list it. Consider this a relisting; on the merits I am Neutral. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:03, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * This is unsourced! This is WP:CRYSTAL!

...Crystal.

...

...

...

...   'THIS! IS! NOT! NOTABLE!'

I had to do it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 18:57, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I will erase the very name of Xerxes (film) from all the histories and add a relevant picture to this discussion. SixthAtom (talk) 22:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 300 (film) Where this project is already mentioned in context. Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:14, 22 January 2011 (UTC)


 * When did flag images and huge headers become the proper format for AFD discussions??   Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:14, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect?! You Greeks take pride in your logic. I suggest you employ it. Consider the beautiful land you so vigorously defend. Picture it reduced to ash at my whim! Consider the fate of your women! Skier Dude  ( talk ) 08:27, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Give them nothing, but take from them everything! (this discussion is fun) SixthAtom (talk) 14:07, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.