Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xexecom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep and move to Xexocom. North America1000 16:55, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Xexecom

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Apparently a tiny hamlet. Couldn't find any Spanish-language sources, just seems to be a placename on a trekking route. Simon Burchell (talk) 16:49, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * According to WP:GEOLAND, any populated place is presumed notable. There are few good secondary sources, but I'm thinking there are enough to suggest that this is a real place. On that basis, I'm saying keep. JMWt (talk) 18:34, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm a bit uneasy about this being a real place at all. The name doesn't seem to read right for a Maya place name. Simon Burchell (talk) 19:47, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guatemala-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:45, 29 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep or Move to Xexocom The government of guatemala has coverage at [site:gob.gt xexocom].  I added a reference for the school to the article.  I don't know why the trekkers often refer to this as Xexecom.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:30, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Well done. That spelling makes more sense, and returns plenty of results from Guatemalan government websites - I would support a move to the correct spelling. Simon Burchell (talk) 18:19, 30 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.