Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xfanz (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete -- JForget 02:25, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Xfanz
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete - 1st AFD closed ten months ago no consensus with the closing admin expressing serious doubts about the notability of this website. In the intervening months the article still does not appear to pass WP:WEB or otherwise be notable. The sourcing is all in the form of press releases and mentions from organizations with which the site has some affiliation (the Free Speech Coalition site sources the mention of Xfanz donating money to the Free Speech Coalition, for example). While not definitive, Google News turns up a single hit which merely mentions Xfanz trivially in passing and Ghits are on the level of blogs and forum posts. There's been more than enough time for sources to materialize to establish notability and they are not forthcoming. Otto4711 (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, clearly fails the WP:RS test. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not sure why the previous AfD was considered no consensus, as only 2 people thought the article was acceptable, and a bunch did not.   Given that, and the fact that there haven't been any real changes to the context, and the fact that the subject doesn't meet WP:WEB nor does the article meet WP:RS, I'll say delete. - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom  --- tqbf  01:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Nobody can say it hasn't been given its chance. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:23, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. scope_creep (talk) 19:20, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- ¿Amar៛ Talk to me / My edits 06:58, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.