Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XgenPlus Enterprise Email


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:35, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

XgenPlus Enterprise Email

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Similar to the Ajay Data, this is completely written for Promotions alone. References are being used to mislead and building foundations to create such article. These days Wikipedia is filled with such promotions. Not-notable for encyclopedia material. Light2021 (talk) 19:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Important This article is written by Company associate and has been notified the same in Talk page. It has clear violation of COI. As appears the definite comments below as well. Light2021 (talk) 15:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

I don't think its a good deletion case. XgenPlus is being used by millions and Notable, which can be also seen just by google. They have recently announced support for IDN, which is first email server in the world, and all over new. XgenPlus now also gets mentioned in draft paper https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-elkchow-iea-deploy/?include_text=1 and great email server platform from INDIA.

Should not be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.63.128.132 (talk) 11:34, 2 November 2016 (UTC)


 * This does not fall within the purview of general and useful knowledge to me, as it concerns only the product and its application and therefore violates WP:NOTADVERTISING. Had the article been written in the larger context of the industry as a whole that might have been different. But it merely expounds the virtues of this particular Linux technology with no attention paid to the broader scope of its impact and application within the computer industry. If this is truly a transformative or revolutionary technology that would certainly change my opinion, but only if the article conveys that fact in an unbiased and useful way. The fact that XgenPlus is used by the Indian Government and 9 million customers is presented without qualification and is worth no more than a subjective "wow."  This article's sole purpose is apparently to extol the virtues of this "product" while offering little in the area of general and useful knowledge. Nor did The "Awards and Achievement"  provide convincing evidence of distinguished recognition or achievement. A complete rewrite more in line with Wiki's guidelines may produce better results.  But as it is now, I prefer to see it Deleted.  It is promotional in nature and not at all in the spirit of encyclopedic knowledge. It reads more like the sales page of a company website.  Thanks for allowing my opinion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:445:8002:BC40:D881:6C8:35AC:EA7C (talk) 20:37, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as entirely advertising and we have and are still wary about such questionable sources as the ones listed because of the notoriety of simply republishing company advertisements and quotes words, therefore there's then nothing here for actual substance, significance or notability. SwisterTwister   talk  21:26, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 15:22, 1 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- a product brochure in the guise of a Wiki article. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:25, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete All advertisement, no notability. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as corporate spam and paid editing with a side of WP:COI. -- Dane 2007  talk 05:11, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.