Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xianyuzhao


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jenks24 (talk) 14:08, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Xianyuzhao

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I'm having trouble even telling what this article is about. AFAICT, it was a small geographical region that does not exist any more. It's not listed in its parent article Dingling, and I can't find any quality references to support new content. As it stands now, it's entirely unreferenced and lacking any useful content. This may be useful to flesh out in the future, if we can find quality sources for it, but at its current state, absolutely none of the content belongs here, and so the article should be deleted. &mdash; Jess &middot; &Delta;&hearts; 18:24, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * This seems to apply equally to Na (state).  &mdash; Jess &middot; &Delta;&hearts; 18:27, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I think we can speedy delete this under A1 or similar. (Or is that term only used for the process initiated by an editor on an article having an administrator look at it immediately?) Hello71 (talk) 02:59, 11 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I don't know if this is an A1. The article is confusing, but it seems to have enough context to distinguish it as a topic. I just simply don't know what that topic is. The confusion could very well come from a language barrier, which another editor may find less ambiguous. You're welcome to CSD it if you'd like, but now that an AfD has started, I think that's the best bet. CSD is supposed to be off the table at this point, short of IAR.) Thanks.  &mdash; Jess &middot; &Delta;&hearts; 04:21, 11 August 2012 (UTC)


 * • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: Article appears to be a translation of zh:鮮于趙 220.231.34.3 (talk) 08:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as unintelligble to the point of being unable to make out what it's supposed to be about. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:23, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete for many of the above reasons - total confusion and lack of citations etc seem to make this just irritating to decipher and perhaps in the future, but..not now. SarahStierch (talk) 06:30, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.