Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xiaomi Mi 6


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:07, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Xiaomi Mi 6

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Just another phone. Not a "flagship" phone as claimed. Fails WP:GNG. (online presence should not be confused with notability.) — usernamekiran (talk)  18:32, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:29, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:29, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

https://www.techzac.com/top-10-smartphone-manufacturers-in-the-world/ http://m.gadgetsnow.com/slideshows/worlds-10-biggest-smartphone-companies/photolist/56223987.cms Charlie pepin (talk) 16:30, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete commercial blurb. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:34, 12 June 2017 (UTC).
 * Oppose Deletion Xiaomi is one of the most popular smartphone brands according to multiple sources:
 * Hi. I agree Xiaomi is a very big company. But the article being discussed is not about the company, it is about their product. The company already has an article: Xiaomi. This product however, is not notable enough for an article in an encyclopaedia. — usernamekiran (talk)  00:21, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * It is a flagship phone from a popular manufacturer. It is also the second smartphone to have the Snapdragon 835 and the first budget smartphone to have the Snapdragon 835.  Charlie pepin (talk) 12:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, i am aware of that, but it still does not make the handset notable. — usernamekiran (talk)  14:23, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * What makes a handset notable? Charlie pepin (talk) 13:56, 17 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Once again, Wikipedia is being used to shill for a company. Exemplo347 (talk) 17:32, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * delete as lacking significant, indepth coverage needed to meet WP:GNG. Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:52, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete As per nominator subject fails WP:GNG.  FITINDIA   05:33, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:36, 18 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.