Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xiaomi Pocophone F1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. czar 10:10, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Xiaomi Pocophone F1

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Gadget websites routinely churn out reviews for products. That's what they do. This product lacks general notability. Graywalls (talk) 04:06, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 04:06, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 04:06, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: This article has enough sourcing that I'm not comfortable soft-deleting it "as if it was a prod". Relisting in the hopes that more input can be obtained.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ST47 (talk) 04:24, 24 November 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:32, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG with significant coverage from multiple independent reliable sources. This phone is at least as significant in India as the OnePlus One was worldwide. See these articles for details: —  Newslinger  talk   21:39, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 * "Xiaomi's Poco F1 phone threatens a price war" from BBC
 * "Xiaomi’s new Pocophone F1 undercuts rivals with a low price and high-end processor" from The Verge
 * "Finally, a cheap smartphone with true flagship power" from Engadget
 * "Xiaomi Pocophone F1, hands on: A flagship-class handset that won't break the bank" from ZDNet
 * "Poco F1 review: A ‘little’ phone with global aspirations" from The Economic Times
 * —  Newslinger  talk   21:39, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources from demonstrate the subject passes WP:GNG. — MarkH21talk 01:30, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. google is getting fairly good information about it, probably pass WP:GNG.- Nahal (T) 09:30, 8 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.