Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xilam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 12:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Xilam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Apparently non-notable film company, fails WP:CORP. It's not clear if the company is independent or a subsidiary of Gaumont. Article is entirely unreferenced, as is the closely similar page on fr.wiki. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:41, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. You need to at least search Variety, Screen International, and The Hollywood Reporter before you nominate a film-related article.  Xilam is apparently a major player in France:, , , , , , , , , , etc.  This is without even touching the mainstream French-language sources, such as Le Monde, which seems to also provide quite a few hits.  However, my French skills are not good enough to reliably translate such articles. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:24, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I've edited the article to address the concerns raised, and I think it looks much better now. It's still a small stub, but it's got enough sources to comfortably demonstrate notability. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:20, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable because it created notable shows. Coverage found also to pass GNG.   D r e a m Focus  22:34, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Apparently notable; the work done by NinjaRobotPirate seems to help demonstrate that.  AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 06:18, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.