Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xmake


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:49, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Xmake

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable, almost no references that aren't by the author/s. There are other tools also called xmake that show up in Google, but almost nothing for this one. No indication of who uses it or where it is used. Document previously nominated for speedy deletion (not carried). Almost no editors except the original directly related author (see Github page at bottom - contacts). peterl (talk) 09:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:02, 28 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete — There is (1) no indication that the subject is well known and (2) can be well-cited by sources. It's hard to find anything reviewing it or assessing usage/popularity, pitfalls etc etc etc. Additional reasoning is also can be found on the . AXO NOV  (talk) ⚑ 19:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails software notability and fails is far short of GNG. I can't find any books or book chapters devoted to the product, which is a good sign it is not notable, also name is ambiguous and is used by others. Footlessmouse (talk) 21:20, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. Fails WP:GNG. -- The SandDoctor Talk 14:29, 4 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.