Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XpoLog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:51, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

XpoLog

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No indication of WP:Notability. Unreferenced. Disputed prod noq (talk) 19:38, 14 April 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the nominator, article is also without sources. RFerreira (talk) 23:40, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. On the one hand, this is a brand new article, and could be massively improved given time.  OTOH, there's no obvious notability.  News search turns up nothing significant.  David V Houston (talk) 01:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacks any source to indicate notability. Pcap ping  16:08, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.