Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xpress Movers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Xpress Movers

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a removal / house moving company. The article is written like an advert, the references are all dead, google news returns no RS reviews of the company. This company has a social media presence but doesn't meet the threshold for inclusion on WP. Desertarun (talk) 10:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:00, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:00, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: I have NO idea why this was citation tagged nine years ago and not filed for deletion back then. No sources, independent or otherwise, no evidence of notability.   Ravenswing      11:19, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Special:Diff/284463661 was 12 years ago, and Special:Diff/759453248 was four. &#9786; Uncle G (talk) 12:51, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * It was citation tagged 12 years ago because it is too hard to nominate things for deletion, and when you do so you open yourself up to venoumous hateful attacks by the defenders of the status quo who believe more in grandfather clause enforcement than a Jim Crow election official in 1952 Mississippi.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:24, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability, written in a style unbefitting an encyclopedia, no viable citations in the article. Also, is one of the three references just a SourceForge link to Media Player Classic? PraiseVivec (talk) 12:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * "notability source". Uncle G (talk) 12:58, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it really is. All those three sources are utter garbage.  One is explicitly a press release site, the second is one, and the putative contribution this company alleges to have made to Media Player Classic is that one of the contributors has an email address from the subject.   Ravenswing      13:59, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not notable. Wasraw (talk) 13:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non notable. Seaweed (talk) 19:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment I guess my frustration at the difficulty of deleting things on Wikipedia got the better of me. I would like to apologize for being too harsh in my criticism of hard core inclusionists. Still it is clear that citation tagging is not working. Nothing inproves. They languish for 12 years. That is an unacceptably high amount of time.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete company is not notable and all the sources currently on the page are links that no longer exist Redoryxx (talk) 18:28, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: No reliable sources, no evidence of notability. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 03:17, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG, no reliable sources available. Sanketio31 (talk) 17:09, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 13:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.