Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xshellz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:58, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Xshellz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm unsure if this passes WP:COMPANY - there do not appear to be third-party sources evident, and I don't suspect that 5,000 subscribers world-wide are an indicator of notability. The company has only existed for 3-4 years. I thought I would bring it here for the community to decide. S.G.(GH) ping! 16:16, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete The article text contains terms like "we" and "our", usually signs of promotion. Multiple searches (Highbeam, Questia, Google) are not turning up anything that would amount to WP:RS; no evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 19:41, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:58, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:58, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:58, 16 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - article lacks independent reliable source coverage to establish notability of this software. A search did not reveal any RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 01:05, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.