Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xterm Pest Management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.Blnguyen | rant-line 02:05, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Xterm Pest Management
Founded this year, I don't see how this has any of the notability required by WP:CORP. Spam. Viridae Talk 23:49, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I disagree, I haven't finished writing the article and linking in the source documents.  Plus I still need to get the stock information for the company.  Xterm Pest Management is also one of the few frandchise pest control companies in the United States.  I don't see a reason to delete this article until it can be reviewed after I finish writing and researching the article. Azselendor 00:17, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure of the process here, I'm new, but how do I state I want to keep the article? Because I do say it should be kept. And it's not spam.  It's not advertising the company and it does serves a purpose. Azselendor 00:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Viridae suggested I repost this from our talk pages here. so I am :P Azselendor 01:32, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I know it's not because of the quality, it's because you think the company is too new to be notable. I disagree, I feel I'm not being giveb enough time to finish the article and provide all the information about the company in question, including information from consumer watchdog groups, the state of florida's department of agriculture, and indepdent publications


 * Keep  I figured it out Azselendor 01:06, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep SWVRoma 01:12, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above comment was the user's first edit. User has only 5 edits as I write. Kimchi.sg 15:06, 13 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete unless and until the article gets cleaned up to explain why the company deserves an article per WP:CORP criteria. The sockpuppetry in this AfD does not bode well for the article either. Kimchi.sg 15:06, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * What sock puppetry are you talking about? I plan to finish the article after this process resolves because, really, what point in there to finish the article if it'll be deleted?  Azselendor 16:56, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * He's referring to a possible sockpuppet voting, which is frowned upon by Wikipedians. - Mailer Diablo 17:57, 13 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete unless evidence of meeting WP:CORP is provided. Stifle (talk) 15:50, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - no independent Google hits. Presently fails WP:CORP. BlueValour 21:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.