Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xtreme Agile Programming


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 12:26, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Xtreme Agile Programming

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I hesitated on tagging this for a speedy G11 because it's not very obviously promotional, and I wasn't sure about A10. User:Trivialist redirected it to Extreme programming (along with Extreme Agile Programming), which I supported, but was reverted by the article creator, and I refuse to edit war.

Google reveals a WP article with Agile software development. It seems like a lot of the sources about extreme agile programming are actually about agile or extreme, not both, and searching for the entire phrase in quotes revealed three results, therefore failing WP:GNG. It just... doesn't explain why it's notable.

Delete, merge, or redirect? &mdash; kikichugirl  inquire 05:06, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  14:10, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Xtreme Delete not really a thing. Artw (talk) 17:07, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 08:29, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - "Agile programming" is a recognised idea and you can go and get formal qualifications and instruction that make you a certified "Agile programmer". The "extreme" version would seem to be the same ideas and concepts, applied more enthusiastically and without some of the separation (which isn't a core methodology of "regular" Agile programming anyway). Agile programming with more meetings? Who knows. Looks like a thing someone invented one day (recently), not a recognised thing that has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 09:01, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Xtreme Delete (hee hee) - No evidence of secondary sources or notability. PianoDan (talk) 15:59, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.