Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xtreme City


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Xtreme City

 * – ( View AfD View log )

As per WP:CRYSTAL. I couldn't find any reliable source which confirmed that the movie is in production. And much of the talk about this movie was before 2011. Propose to delete. — Pewfly (talk) 19:47, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Hasn't started filming. No known release date. SL93 (talk) 22:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 20 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect and mention in director's artcle. While this announced film does not as yet have the sourcing to allow it as an exception to WP:NFF as a separate article, it is seen that policy DOES allow that it might at least be spoken of somwhere if properly sourced. Sending our readers then to the Paul Schrader article where it makes sense to have this film discussed is per both policy and guideline.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:55, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFF. What sort of policy are you referring to that says you should redirect future films to their directors? Bzweebl (talk) 03:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Outside of just AFD discussions, you'll find that policy WP:NOT states "All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred. It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced." So when we have enough sources speaking about a planned film, but not enough to merit a separate article per WP:NF or WP:NFF, it is approprpriate to consider other places where sourced information may still be of benefit to our readers.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 08:37, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I retract my previous comment. Bzweebl (talk) 01:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * DOes that mean your delete above is now okay with a redirect?  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 09:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete for now. Lack of coverage in reliable sources. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 12:44, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry to disagee, but we DO have numerous reliable sources speaking about this planned film. And as we DO have sources, and even if failing WP:NFF, policy instructs us that we can still discuss this well-covered topic somewhere... and a redirect serves our readers and can be undone and the article expanded and sourced according when WP:NF is met.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 09:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:CRYSTAL - though note that an article would be appropriate if the project gets off the ground. No objection to the redirect. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 21:58, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.