Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xtreme Hardcore Federation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Petros471 20:17, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Xtreme Hardcore Federation
An E-wrestling federation where people pretend to be wrestlers, simply none notable. Englishrose 21:46, 12 June 2006 (UTC) color="black">Inter lingua ]] talk 00:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. &mdash; Khoikhoi 04:00, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Hello, I'm the original author of the entry. Yes, it is E-wrestling, but as that article states, most last a few months at best. XHF has lasted five years. We've had over 400 members, and I was doing this article as a surprise to the people who frequent the website as I am one of the runners of it. My comp crashed when I had half the article done and was uninspired to re-write it for awhile afterward and just kept up the skeleton, and for that I'm sorry. But I have let people know it exists so we can get more information on it done quickly. While we may be in the E-wrestling genre, we are the largest E-fed on the internet, and for us to not be notable in said genre would be like saying that D&D or Warhammer are not notable in the Table Top Roleplaying genre simply because they are a type of outlet for it. Thank you for your time. --hardcore247 09:18, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep In accordance with what the author stated, I would further that the info will very soon be updated. As for it being non notable, I would have to raise the argument in the same manner as the author. It is a significance amongst the E-Wrestling community, and therefore is notable within it own realm of information. If you allow the artical on E-Wrestling themselves, why not have a significant subject/example of one? If it would befit it better, perhaps add the XHF article as a reference of example to the E-Wrestling Atrical itself. I realize that in the end it is far from my decision, but these are my reasons for keeping it, and would like for them to be considered. FrankClassic 16:54, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep In my honest opinion, it actually helps the people that are searching up professional wrestling here because it serves a point that we are a strong community with a bunch of nice and really talented people that know the factor of what pro wrestling really is, that's one of the reasons why this E-wrestling stuff is around. Sure, it needs editing up big time like you said but once it's fully complete, you'll realize the value of it. Good day. Faded 13:01 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I concur with the people who say we must keep this entry. It will help people looking for a succesful and fun e-fed. We have articles on cartoons and other fictional things. This is basically a story. Do we delete entrys on The Catcher and The Rye? No. Albeit, the XHF isn't a book. But still, we shouldn't delete it as it would help certain people looking for certain things.
 * Delete - Article is about a non-notable organization, was initially created by someone affiliated with it, and the majority of "Keep" votes here seems to be coming from people with an obvious interest in having the article stay. The article is, in my opinion, a vanity page. --Martey 10:53, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.