Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xtreme Jailbreak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ( X! ·  talk )  · @107  · 01:33, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Xtreme Jailbreak

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Does not meet criteria of WP:WEB. "Unique" Google hits:. ... disco spinster   talk  02:50, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete- Not notable, looks kinda like ad.-- iBentalk/contribs If you reply here, please place a talkback notification on my page. 03:06, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable online community about a non-notable modification to a notable game. Definitely doesn't meet WP:Notable, and probably qualifies for a speedy as an advertising. Frmatt (talk) 03:28, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment, IMO this is not in speedy territory. I declined a speedy under A7 on the grounds that "largest community" is a claim of significance, though it may not rise to notability. Some of the content is promotional, but that could be dealt with by normal editing, if the site is shown to be notable. The real issue here is notability. WP:WEB says nothing about the size of a community, it requires outside notice, either in the form of independent coverage or significant awards. No such outside notice is currently asserted for this site. However, a count of google hits is not a valid criterion either. DES (talk) 06:15, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this website. Joe Chill (talk) 12:38, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- Pcap  ping  08:45, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Are use aware of what "steam" is, if you don't google it and come back to me, if you do then how are you possibly calling this an unreliable source —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.185.76.100 (talk) 08:56, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * You ask are use [sic] aware of what "steam" is? Yes I am. It is an open group which anyone can join. Amongst other things it hosts forums which anyone at all can join and post to, which makes it an unreliable source. Are you aware of what Wikipedia regards as a reliable source? If not then you may like to read our guideline on reliable sources, and then you will see why we do not regard "steam" as one. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:38, 1 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:38, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.