Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xtremebitz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Questionable IP votes attacking logical established-user votes AdamBiswanger1 03:22, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Xtremebitz
Not notable. Appears to just be a podcast Bill.matthews 19:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

wikipedia -- not notable, appears to just be a website. Xtremebitz is NOT just a podcast unless wikipedia is "just a website"

Podcast or not, it's still a broadcast. Besides, it's a live online radio show on the second largest alternative station online. If that's not notable, I dont' know what is.

a PODCAST is notable by Wikipedia standards. Please refer to this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28web%29

MadAlt 22:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: Madalt (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.

Many of the bands interviewed on this show are quite notable, the show attracts notable guests, who are you to judge the notability of the show? 72.135.236.226 10:56, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

F3llah1n 08:01, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Broadcast live every week with thousands of listeners, as well as an often downloaded podcast of the live show.
 * Interviews many large bands (a list of which is on the page), who all have their own detailed Wikipedia articles.
 * Broadcast simultaneously on 3 large internet radio networks, including idobi radio.


 * Delete per nom. --Haakon 19:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep meets critera User:MadAlt — Possible : Madalt (talk • contribs
 * Keep meets critera at WP:BIO 72.135.236.226 03:06, 6 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: 72.135.236.226 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 05:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Gotta love the SPAs. -- Kicking222 05:39, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep just look at the list of interviewed bands. If thats not notable what is. f3llah1n  (talk)  04:02, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep meets critera Mr.Whitebeard 21:39, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails to show any notable sources (like media sources) that mention it and for this reason fails, WP:WEB, too. Anomo 03:46, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: From WP:WEB: "Web-specific content[3] is notable if it meets any one of the following criteria: (#3) The content is distributed via a site which is both well known and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster" f3llah1n  (talk)  15:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep meets critera
 * Keep Definitly meets critera, its a podcast, end of story. - Tiptup300 "AmpSigz FTW!"
 * Keep Is notable, and has sources that mention it. Look down. =P

Here's a link to an outside source reporting on the show: http://www.punknews.org/article.php?sid=11760

The day Xtremebitz isn't notable will be the same day hell freezes over! Shouldn't people be able to look the show up? The show has so many listeners and it just keeps growing and it would be in wikipedieas best interest to keep xtremebitz on the site, when xtremebitz gets really big then wikipedia will be begging to have them back if they remove them.

Xtremebitz isn't just a small thing, it's big. It has listeners all over the place, it interviews bands and gives growing bands a chance to spread the word about themselves. And if a member of a band wants to look up what they're getting themselves into they should be able to using wikipedia

Xtremebitz is great, it should stay on wikipedia. Not only is it a great radioprogram but also it encourages freedom of speech. Wikipedia has lots of articles about drugs, addictive ones too. And Xtremebitz is addictive so people should know what to do if they are an addict
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.