Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xuess


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:33, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Xuess

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This in-universe article is about a fictional character from a novel called The Mython, which seems to be un-notable altogether. A google search does not yield any results, nor does a search at bookfinder. There isn't any reference that this novel exists at all. Note: The article was created today, a PROD was contested by the creator. AdAstra reloaded (talk) 19:58, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I endorsed the PROD rationale, and it still fits. Completely non-notable fiction character. The Blade of the Northern Lights  ( 話して下さい ) 20:07, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:23, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:23, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - if the book is self-published the information is virtually unverifiable. --Anthem 21:07, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note Anthem of joy has been indef blocked as a sockpuppet of Claritas . --Tothwolf (talk) 03:36, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable.  EBE123  talkContribs 21:57, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: The fictional character does not meet the general notability guideline and it is a plot-only description of a fictional work. Since the article is completely unreferenced, the content is original research. No reliable third-party sources to presume that the fictional character deserves an article. Not even the supposed short novel The Mython, in which the fictional character is allegedly the protagonist, appears to exist, so it might even be a hoax. Jfgslo (talk) 17:24, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.