Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xujia Wang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. per clear consensus JForget  21:48, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Xujia Wang

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A generally not notable person only mentioned in the news for one event of insider trading (WP:BLP1E). She was not the vice president of Morgan Stanley, but a unit within the company. I find no coverage of her other than the insider trading case, which is better mentioned in the Morgan Stanley article. Apoc2400 (talk) 18:47, 3 September 2009 (UTC)


 * She was a vice president. See: . --208.90.100.111 (talk) 18:50, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * "The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) said Ms Wang, a Morgan Stanley vice president..." Tan   &#124;   39  18:57, 3 September 2009 (UTC)


 * "a former vice president in Morgan Stanley's finance department's valuation review group" "vice president in one of the investment bank's transaction support units". --Apoc2400 (talk) 19:01, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, that's how VPs of companies are usually distributed. There can be a dozen VPs of one company, all overseeing one division or another. I dunno how germane this is to the debate, anyway. Tan   &#124;   39  19:02, 3 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. You do realize that large corporations have a multitude of vice-presidents? One white-collar crime conviction without any particular notable role in the larger Morgan Stanley situation does not notable make, especially for a BLP. NTK (talk) 19:03, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Second NTK's reasoning, and emphasise BLP policy. We'll never find any sources about the rest of this person's life and it's hardly fair or balanced to reduce an entire life to a single incidence of insider trading. Alex Harvey (talk) 00:42, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. The fact that the court staggered their 18-month sentences so that one parent could be home to care for their baby enhances notability. --CliffC (talk) 21:38, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, no evidence of notability. Staggered sentences like this are altogether irrelevant to notability.  Nyttend (talk) 15:29, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, no evidence of notability. Factiva gives just 58 results for a search for "Jennifer Xujia Wang". Any notable VP should turn up at least a thousand mentions. Ottre 22:28, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom  SPLETTE &#32;:]&#32;How's my driving? 02:05, 7 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong delete per nomination, clearly WP:BLP1E. ukexpat (talk) 18:12, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.