Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xyence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   Wifione    .......  Leave a message  06:23, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Xyence

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable company. Subject does not appear to have received reliable, third party coverage. Their "aggressive marketing" as mentioned in the article has resulted in some Ghits, but nothing independent that I have seen. VQuakr (talk) 07:58, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Question. Is Xyience the same company? It also seems to be in the health-drink business, and the similarity of the name is striking. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:35, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete either way. Google Books and Google Scholar turns up nothing that talks about the company in depth, be it spelt Xyence or Xyience. Fails WP:N. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:38, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 5 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as spam, like XYIENCE (talk) (text was almost identical). – Athaenara  ✉  04:36 and 06:30, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * And Xyience energy drink. How many of these have there been? – Athaenara  ✉  04:38, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.