Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Y. Patty Chen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 16:13, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Y. Patty Chen

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Dearth of reliable sources, questionable notability, appears promotional. Re-created numerous times by single-purpose account. JNW (talk) 15:52, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Many of the sources are links to blogs, which aren't normally considered reliable, and, as you said, this article's notability is questionable. The Utahraptor Talk to me/Contributions 16:21, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt (Patty Chen, Patty chen, Y. Patty Chen --- I think that's all). Blatant self-promotion of local real estate agent clearly failing WP:BIO. Name is too common to be useful as a search term either in Chinese or English, but Google shows no evidence of any reliable, independent, non-trivial sources about her companies:
 * --- 51 and 6 hits, respectively
 * --- 6 and 7 hits, respectively
 * Thanks, cab (call) 04:04, 4 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. There are several reliable sources, which is evidence that this is not self promotional. She seems to be a well known entrepreneur in China. 19:07, 6 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonyshu726 (talk • contribs)  — Tonyshu726 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * keep. Most of the sources look like the third parties.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.76.29.64 (talk) 02:21, 8 October 2010 (UTC)  — 173.76.29.64 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep. Here is another example of a non trivial secondary source from China's largest law firm DaCheng, describing the investment committee her company led to China. Along with other links mentioned on this wikipedia article, there is no lack of reliable secondary sources, thus she cannot be deemed not notable.--Gouhst (talk) 02:52, 8 October 2010 (UTC) — Gouhst (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment A law firm's website is probably not a reliable source, nor would it establish notability. WP:RELIABLE is the guideline. JNW (talk) 03:00, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Furthermore the mention given there is quite trivial. It's a 400-word press release in which Ms. Chen and her company are mentioned once in a long list of companies and people who visited Dacheng's office. A reliable, non-trivial secondary source would be, for example, a newspaper article which actually discussed Ms. Chen or one of her companies. cab (call) 03:10, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Spam, no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  00:28, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.