Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YAFLA (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:42, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

YAFLA
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No reliable sources or indication of notability whatsoever. » Swpbτ • ¢ 14:29, 20 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as a neologism that isn't notable. No references, and I can't find anything on Google (except this, but I doubt that's anything significant). The first nomination, from 2005, seems like it was inappropriately closed. The only keep arguments there were WP:INTERESTING and WP:PERNOM, and the nominator's logic actually made a lot of sense: "Quasi-neologism. Via google, appears not in common use (if one only searches in English, it appears to be a word in some other languages otherwise it's the name of a blog site}. Also, where do we stop: YASLA, YAELA, etc.? Perhaps merge and  redirect to TLA. Ifnord 15:15, 30 November 2005 (UTC)".   The Earwig  (Talk &#124; Contribs) 16:13, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NEO. Not sure why it survived AfD 4 years ago, but it hasn't really expanded like they planned. Niteshift36 (talk) 07:21, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.